up below to get
Weekly Newsletter today!
Murder By Numbers Review
By Shawn McKenzie 04/12/2002
Why are there so few suspense/thrillers that deliver on their
promise? For every Seven or Sixth Sense we get an AntiTrust.
For every Memento or Usual Suspects we get a Gossip. Do you
get my point?
In my opinion, a thriller is a genre that should make you leave the theater with
your mouth hanging open in shock of what you just saw. It should make you want
to go over the events in the movie over and over in your head so you can make
sense of what you just saw. It shouldn't be a cookie-cutter movie that any fan
(like me) of thrillers could put together in a week.
That is exactly what Murder By Numbers is. This is surprising since it is
directed by Barbet Schroeder, the director of an actual suspenseful, creepy
movie called Single White Female. He also did an (almost) equally
suspenseful movie called Desperate Measures. What went wrong here?
There is one thing that is similar in all three movies: they all have a very
interesting plot concept. Single White Female's plot involves one woman's
obsession of another woman to the point of wanting to take over the other
woman's life. Desperate Measure's plot involves a detective's hunt for a
serial killer whose bone marrow type matches the type for his ill son.
In Murder By Numbers, it is a cross between "C.S.I. Crime Scene
Investigation" and what "Law & Order: Criminal Intent" was promising
to be (but didn't deliver.) It is about two intelligent high school kids named
Richard Haywood and Justin Pendleton (played by Ryan Gosling and Michael Pitt
respectively) who are obsessed with criminology. Justin especially seems to know
what every move the police might make. They are so obsessed with it that they
wonder if they could get away with a random murder. Enter Detective Cassie
Mayweather (Sandra Bullock) to solve the murder of a woman who was strangled and
then dragged out into the woods. The audience gets to see the investigation from
the detective and criminal points-of-view (a la "L&O: CI") with a lot of
criminology terminology (a la "C.S.I.")
Sounds like an interesting movie, right? Somehow, this movie becomes so
predictable that my girlfriend and I were both telling each other what was going
to happen in the next scene (and we always got it right!) Now I know we are
given both points-of-view, but the criminal's moves after their original set-up
are all too by the book for stupid movie criminal slip-ups.
I'm also getting tired of the character with a haunted past. In Murder By
Numbers, Cassie is haunted by a past case she has to testify at its parole
hearing. It is meant to be the arbitrator for her fear of intimacy, but it feels
In the end I left the theater not trying to figure out the events of the movie,
but instead trying to figure out why Schroeder made it so easy to guess what the
next events were. Much less to say, my mouth wasn't left hanging open, but my
finger was scratching my head with puzzlement and my eyes were rolling with
disappointment. That should not be the end result of a thriller.
SEE THIS MOVIE!
Catch this movie at the theater if you can...
Wait until it comes out on video...
Wait until it plays on HBO, Showtime, Starz, etc...
Demand your money back, even if you saw it for free!
Return to Movies